Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP)
The Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) collection is intended to be a resource for everyone in the NHS, public health and social care for making decisions about patient care or the use of resources. The collection comprises:
- QIPP case studies are examples of how health and social care staff are improving quality and productivity across the NHS and social care. Case studies are evaluated based on quality improvements, savings, evidence and implementation and are peer reviewed.
- Cochrane quality and productivity topics which are drawn from systematic reviews by the Cochrane Collaboration that may help inform local initiatives address the quality and productivity challenge
- Links to other tools and resources that support the quality and productivity challenge.
Click here to view the Process Manual which describes the processes for the quality assurance of QIPP case studies and Cochrane quality and productivity topics.
Click here for a full list of all published QIPP case studies including a tool that allows potential savings to be calculated and sorted based on quality gains.
To receive a monthly alert detailing new QIPP case studies published to the collection, please email your contact details to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
If you have a good initiative that you are currently implementing or have implemented already, we want to hear from you. Our analysts will be happy to talk to you and provide advice on the suitability of your initiative for the collection and the type/level of information required. Go to "Help us to build the QIPP collection" to find out more about completing a submission.
Recommended QIPP case studies
Opportunistic screening by pulse palpation of patients over 65 has been used in 18 regions to improve detection of atrial fibrillation. Quality is improved by the optimal treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation reducing risk of stroke.
Efficiency in screening has been used in 13 regions to improve detection of cervical cancer. Quality is improved by the optimal treatment of patients with suspected cervical cancer, thereby reducing the risk of death. Productivity is increased by
Enhanced recovery programmes use evidence based interventions to improve pre-, intra-, and post-operative care. They have enabled early recovery, discharge from hospital, and more rapid return to normal activities. Quality is increased by reducing
The NHS Institute supported Chief Executives and senior leadership to champion change and improvement across NHS organisations in all areas of the stroke pathway. Quality was improved by reducing mortality, time in A&E, and delay in CT scanning.
Ten pilot trusts have successfully implemented service re-design for the Fractured Neck of Femur patient pathway. This improved quality by: improving multi disciplinary and cross agency teamworking, reducing mortality, and time to theatre, and
Help us to build the QIPP Collection
Submit Your Ideas
We wants to hear from you if you have an example you think should be part of the QIPP collection.
The QIPP User Guide outlines the level of supporting information you need to provide in your submission. Then use the QIPP Submission Template to submit your example.
- QIPP Submission User Guide.
- QIPP Submission Template.
- SDU Carbon Impact Assessment Template (Optional - see User Guide)
Please email your completed submission form or any questions you may have to email@example.com
We would like to hear from health and social care professionals who are interested in becoming external advisers for the QIPP collection. External advisers support our quality assurance process by helping to assess new examples which have been submitted to us. More information is available on the external adviser role description .
and submit these to firstname.lastname@example.org
Cochrane quality and productivity topics
The Cochrane topics in the NICE QIPP collection come from the ‘implications for practice’ section in systematic reviews written by health professionals working internationally and published by the Cochrane Collaboration. They are presented here with relevant background information, including costing analysis. The Cochrane topics may help to inform local initiatives to address the quality and productivity challenge.
Links to other tools and resources
NICE has a range of products and services including ‘do not do’ recommendations, 'referral advice' recommendations and the Shared Learning database to help reduce inneficiency and share learning in implementation.
The site was created by the DH policy team to find and bring together information about QIPP, its workstreams and regional commissioning plans.
Audit Commission resources include a briefing which looks at reducing spending on low clinical value treatments. Also, their health studies programme aims to improve local public services through its independent authoritative analysis of national evidence and local practice.
This key resource aims to reduce unwarranted variation in healthcare to increase value and improve quality (prepared by Muir Gray and Phil daSilva).
Health Foundation review of the evidence of whether improving quality can also save money for health service providers.
Seven medical specialties address how they can help tackle the NHS financial challenge.